Onde Estamos
Rod. Dom Pedro I, km 47
Nazaré Paulista, SP, Brasil
Caixa Postal 47 – 12960-000
Tel: (11) 3590-0041
IPÊ’s Environment and Sustainability in Urban Areas department was set up in 2016 and has a team of professionals who study and promote discussions on relevant issues with different social actors.
The initiative is based on the expertise of the Institute, which has a series of products related to biodiversity conservation and urban ecosystem services. Some examples are the Management Plans for forest areas in urban areas such as Pedra Branca State Park, Guaratiba Biological Reserve, Fazenda do Carmo Municipal Nature Park and São Bartolomeu Municipal Park. In addition, projects for the integrated management of protected areas in urban areas such as the one developed for the Banhado region of São José dos Campos and the afforestation plan for the city of Atibaia, recognized by the Blue Green Municipality program. Also noteworthy are the Econegotiations carried out by IPÊ in the Pontal do Paranapanema and Ariri regions, and the mobilizations for tree planting in urban areas such as the cities of Teodoro Sampaio and Nazaré Paulista (SP),
Creation of a positive agenda together with public authorities
Through the dialogue maintained by IPÊ with various public authorities in the regions where it operates and a survey with some of its representatives, a certain difficulty was identified for city halls in conducting planning exercises, which establish priorities and goals to address the challenges conservation and protection of natural resources in urban and peri-urban environments. And when this exercise takes place, it is still necessary to overcome obstacles for the effective implementation of what was planned.
Such difficulties seem to be due to the lack of adequate technical staff (considering the small number of technicians, but also the qualification necessary to conduct such processes) and the scarce financial resources allocated for this purpose, but above all it seems to be related to the definition of government policies. which has not valued and recognized the environmental, economic and social potential of plans, programs and projects aimed at conserving biodiversity and ecosystem services in urban environments. Such deficiencies are more common in smaller municipalities, with up to 50 thousand inhabitants, which deserve a careful look as they correspond to more than two thirds of Brazilian municipalities.
However, it is necessary to look at this reality with the perspective of establishing a positive agenda and as an opportunity to engage public managers to build partnerships with NGOs, teaching and research institutions and other civil society or state and federal organizations capable of , together, formulate and implement new strategic and innovative policies and governance mechanisms to face these challenges.
With the Urban Area Study Group – GEAU, IPÊ proposes to look for ways to include the environmental variable in the urban planning process and ways to make the urban, peri-urban and rural landscape more integrated, enabling the maintenance of biodiversity and other services ecosystems.
Urban growth and the migration of populations from rural environments to cities is a global trend. According to the United Nations, in 1950, only 30% of people in the world lived in cities. This number rose to 50% in 2007 and forecasts indicate that between 2010 and 2030, 60% of the world's population will have left rural areas and migrated towards urban areas (TRZYNA, 2014).
In Brazil, these data are even more significant. In 1980, around 68% of the Brazilian population lived in cities and, in 2010, this number rose to 85% (IBGE, 2014), an even higher percentage than that observed in the world average. This entire increase in the number of populations living in cities often occurs without adequate urban planning, which impacts the organization of territorial space, overloads environmental resources, affecting the environment and people's quality of life.
Thus, they are increasingly notorious:
- the scarcity of natural resources (including water);
- environmental degradation;
- climate change (with rising sea levels, higher temperatures, variation in rainfall and floods, droughts, storms and more frequent and severe heat waves);
- demographic and social changes associated with urbanization and population growth (increase in wealth and absolute number of poor people)
As cities grow, the pressure on the remaining native vegetation also increases. This growth situation directly impacts natural areas, including terrestrial protected areas. Given this scenario, the conservation of urban forests and other natural areas gains even more importance, as they provide ecosystem services, which are fundamental to sustaining human health and well-being and promoting environmental quality in cities and their surroundings ( NOWAK AND WALTON, 2005).
Some local interventions can contribute to maintaining or increasing biodiversity and quality of life in urban environments:
- restoration of existing habitats in cities;
- enrichment or gradual reintroduction of plants and animals (increasing the complexity of ecosystems and the services they provide);
- planting native species in parks, squares, streets, domestic gardens, vertical gardens and rooftops, as well as other areas, which diversifies the environment that supports mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, bees and other insects;
- creation of small wetlands, such as lakes or depressions, which helps provide a variety of ecosystem services.
(Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity-2012).
Benefits of Urban green areas
(Angela Pellin)
Environmental |
Protection of a sample of the ecosystem and associated biodiversity. |
Increased soil permeability in urban areas. |
Protection of watercourses, springs and riparian forests. |
Water production and purification. |
Stormwater drainage and flood control. |
Control of erosion and mass movements. |
Control of water, atmospheric and noise pollution. |
Microclimatic regulation. |
Socioeconomic and Cultural |
Possibility of improving the quality of life of surrounding residents and users. |
Conservation of historical-cultural heritage. |
Real estate appreciation in the surrounding area. |
Opportunity to generate income for the local community. |
Opportunity for recreation in contact with nature for surrounding residents and users. |
Maintenance and conservation of sacred spaces. |
Reducing the stress of urban life. |
Provision of space for social interaction. |
Aesthetics |
Protection of natural beauty and reduction of visual pollution. |
Discontinuity of the urban fabric. |
Educational or Awareness |
Numerous possibilities for environmental education activities, linked to both formal and informal education. |
Potential for interaction with a large number of people who live nearby. |
Potential for interaction with a large number of visitors due to its proximity to large urban centers. |
Possibility of interaction with occasional users who use the area only to pass through or to carry out sporting or recreational activities. |
Ease of serving people with special needs due to its easy access. |
Raising awareness among a large number of people who live in urban environments, highlighting the importance of conserving these and other natural areas.. |
Adapted from Pellin et al. (2014). Consolidated from Menezes and Mendes (2001), Melazo and Colasanti (2003), Gomes and Soares (2003), Souza (2010), Pitt and Boulle (2010) and Brigs (2012).
Rod. Dom Pedro I, km 47
Nazaré Paulista, SP, Brasil
Caixa Postal 47 – 12960-000
Tel: (11) 3590-0041
Termos de Uso | Estatuto
Copyright © Ipê – Instituto de Pesquisas Ecológicas.
Email: ipe@ipe.org.br